SATANISTS & PAEDOPHILES
AND THOSE WHO PROTECT THEM
A case of very poor judgment by Hulls
by Andrew Bolt
Sunday Herald Sun 31 October, 2004
Mirrored from: http://www.sos-family.org.au/_cyberjustice/Docs/satanists.asp
ANOTHER new law,
another danger to worry about, thanks to the Bracks
Government.
Judges and
lawyers are worried as we all should be - by a radical plan by Attorney-General
Rob Hulls to hire temporary judges. Hulls says he
wants to get rid of a backlog of court cases by hiring lawyers as acting
judges. Once the backlog is gone, so will be these judges - back to their old
jobs. It sounds so practical, doesn't it?
In fact, it's a menace, particularly when the man
who will do all this hiring and firing of temporary judges is the highly
political Hulls, who has already given us a Koorie court and an affirmative-action plan to appoint more
female QCs. Our judges have always been appointed for indefinite terms and been
made almost impossible to sack - and for a good reason.
It is too dangerous to have judges depend on the
Government for their job, particularly when the Government prosecutes criminal cases
and is involved in a quarter of the civil cases, too.
How safe would you feel taking on the Government in
court,
knowing the judge's job may depend on pleasing the
Attorney-General?
And that's the
trouble with temporary judges. Their future as a judge may very well be seen as
depending on pleasing a Rob Hulls.
Would temporary
judges dare criticise affirmative action in a discrimination case, for example,
when Hulls is hot for it? Would they dare rule against Aboriginal claims?
Hulls' Bill to
appoint acting judges is expected to be put before Parliament this week. Let's
see if our politicians vote for judges who are fearless, or ones they can
scare.
Andrew Bolt has captured in his article the spirit of our times and given
our society a glimpse of what is already happening right under our noses.
The
Story
You
don’t have to go very far to discover the serious problems and conflicts of
interest prevalent within a legal system that such appointments as is envisaged
by this proposed bill creates. One such institution in
Since
it’s inception VCAT has been contentious; it decides
on town planning issues, hears disputes involving landlords and tenants, and is
the principle port of call to have decisions made by the government reviewed. A
lawyer can apply to become a sitting Member of VCAT. The writer has been told
that a brothel owner/solicitor successfully applied some years back.
However if the
government wants to cover-up, it makes sure that the people [The Network] that
know about the crime are able to be controlled in some way. They must also keep
these people under close scrutiny so that they can monitor at close hand that
they are doing what they are told, to be rewarded and punished when
appropriate, etc.
i.e.
Yeldum J, Franka Arena, etc.
VCAT in Precedent Case
In
1995 a precedent case before VCAT was bought by a father to review a decision
of the Department of Human Services in respect to decisions (or the lack of)
made not to protect his child from what appeared to be
paedophile/satanic abuse perpetrated by the child’s mother and her associates
including employees of DHS.
The
father was told by experts that his child from age two was being physically and
sexually abused by his mother and then from three and a half possibly
undergoing sexual abuse by multiple offenders, being drugged, tortured, and sodomised. Added to this the child says that he is forced
to eat feaces, drink blood, and seen a child being killed! The child
Exploitation Unit investigator at the time told the father that after
conferring with colleges she believed that the boy was involved in some sort of
ritual sexual abuse (sometimes referred to as satanic abuse).
After
attempts by DHS and VCAT to derail the hearing, wrongly stating that VCAT had
no jurisdiction to hear the case, eventually the hearing begun two years later
in November 1997 where part time member Mr. Robert Davis presided on this first
case for child protection in VCAT.
Thirty Day Hearing aborted
In
the VCAT hearing DHS gave evidence first and admitted that they had no case
against the father; even their only expert Professor Robert Adler turned on
them saying that the father had valid concerns and that DHS misinformed him and
withheld vital information when they first requested his report. Tribunal
member Davis handled this dilemma by continually interrupting proceedings to
housekeep his appointment schedule. He would also censure David Perkins of
counsel from asking any probing questions of DHS witnesses, rather he protected
them, stating that they had better things to do than to waste time in VCAT. The
actions by member Davis from inception can be described as nothing short of a
perversion of justice unseen before and in the second week in February 1998 he
unlawfully closed the fathers case mid way through the
first of six experts to testify that the child was at serious risk of abuse.
The father was in shock but together enough to take out a Supreme Court
injunction from member Davis proceeding further. The father was then informed
that VCAT would hand down their decision nevertheless. On the 17 March 1998 the
father wrote to member Davis that to hand down his decision on that day while
an injunction in the Supreme Court was on foot would possibly abort the case.
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/disp.pl/au/cases/vic/aat/1995/038833.html
VCAT’s plan worked
though, as the delays that this would create
would certainly
allow the child’s unscrutinised abuse to continue.
To
exemplify ‘governments evil intent, DHS wrote in their final written submission
that if the Tribunal ruled that the boy was at risk they would ignore any order
to protect the child because the Secretary of DHS refuses to change his mind.
It appears from this that the Network has infiltrated DHS right to the top.
That may explain that when DHS were notified of an international paedophile in
1994 rather that notify the police they employed him. And when you witness
first hand the evil goings on in the Children’s Court such a submission to a
court would not surprise anyone.
Decision on Internet – with
Names
While
the Supreme Court injunction is in force VCAT then post the judgement
on the internet on 9 June 1998. When in October 1998 Balmford
J. in the Supreme Court decided that member
The
decision that was posted on the internet by Davis is the antithesis of what
occurred within those thirty hearing days, and in true dishonest form, Davis
cowardly includes a section dedicated entirely to smearing Mr. Perkins who
acted entirely appropriately in the case (the file and transcript is available
from VCAT or the father upon request). VCAT not only post their fraudulent
decision on the internet but allowed all names including the child’s to be
published. Yet how can this be so? Disclosing names of
children involved with allegations of sexual abuse is illegal isn’t it,
and what about the secrecy provisions of s.121 of the Family Court?
If a
Satanist/paedophile was searching the internet for a
possible victim, he or
she, would find this case appear!
Many times the
father has objected to this illegal
internet posting but
he has been simply ignored.
VCAT as
Coward, Bigot, Craven, and Dishonest
When
the father’s counsel Mr. David Perkins came before Tribunal member Davis on
another case in October 2000 it was by no accident; the satanic/paedophile
Network kicked in to continue their agenda of evil by creating an untenable
situation where Davis would have to recuse himself
because of his unlawful and illegal actions and clear personal bigotry he
showed towards Mr. Perkins in the child protection case of 1998. Mr. Perkins
told
The choice
words that Perkins used was an accurate description
of the behaviour
of the Tribunal member and VCAT as a whole.
VCAT
have since falsely stated in writing to the father that since the decision
handed down by Tribunal member Davis in March 1998 they no longer have
jurisdiction and the case is closed. What about the Supreme Court’s decision
for a rehearing? Unbelievable.
And when the father asked for his documents to be returned for an investigation
under the provisions of the Whistleblower Act in 2001, VCAT flatly refuse to
return then. One can only conclude that the intent behind such behaviour is
dishonesty and cover-up and a continued perversion of justice.
Case History within the
Department of Human Services
It
took the father some years to realise that the very
organization that was meant to assist him with his protective concerns was the same
organization that associates with and harbors paedophiles,
sexual deviants, and child abusers.
Every day some tragedy again hits the media, but nothing changes. The
writer would be surprised if the government knew where more than 10% of their
charges were at any one time; these and the rest are off sniffing inhalants or
taking drugs, being raped and sodomised, or selling
themselves on the street to survive.
Documents
from the government files have gone walkabout over the years but the father has
placed copies in numerous locations so that the incriminating evidence from
their files are exposed when the case finally is addressed. Altering reports,
fabrication of evidence, and other criminal activities are commonplace within
this evil organization that will protect it’s own
rather than the children it has been mandated to protect.
Six
weeks after the father’s contact is stopped DHS inform the father that another
notification had been received; the child this time (4 ½ yo)
is found sucking on another child’s penis stating he had been taught this some
time back by a ‘big person’. DHS conclude it to be normal childhood play.
Another
serious independent notification is received by DHS another month later but
they do not inform the father; he finds out from government documents produced
in VCAT over a year later. Notifications stop because the mother relocates to a
north-western country town, incidentally an area known for activities such as
secluded forest rituals and satanic abuse.
Between 20-30
notifications were lodged with DHS but they covered up because their own staff
and associates were involved in the abuse of the child.
DHS have
stated in writing that even if the mother was killed
they would not
allow the child to be with his father.
Case History within the
Family Court
In
fact the Family Court work hand in hand with DHS to inflict the government agenda
of destroying families by taking away the innately protective biological
father. Family Law barristers who act as Tribunal members seems
to be ok for those that can assume independence when the reverse is the reality
[Renata Alexander and Robert Davis please stand up].
Statistically approximately 40% of child abuse occurs
where the biological father is not present, 2% when present; what a great way
for the government to prime children for paedophilia by removing fathers
through these agencies. The writer believes that the Family Court is used as a
safe house for gender benders, sexual predators, paedophiles
and the like and there is no greater pool of these lost souls within DHS. Our
society today is a product of our governments
misguidance
The
results of the 11 year history of the case is that the Network ie Courts, judges, lawyers, court staff, government, etc are in control so that no
hearing will ever take place! But if you don’t know; the Family Court has a
written agreement between DHS and themselves to snooker any chance of fair play
or justice in any case involving child abuse. DHS simply gets in the ear of the
Family Court staff prior to any documents being filed to dictate their and the
governments agenda on any case before the court.
It
is the perfect protection network for government as they have enormous power
behind the scenes. In fact the writer believes that a Family Court Judges brief
is to not question the government in child welfare matters. The case involved a
boy child alleged to have been raped, sodomised, and
tortured while in his care of his mother, with DHS supporting the mother inspite of the extensive evidence to the contrary. It was
obvious that DHS were concealing Satanist/paedophiles.
This came to a head in 1996 when DHS were notified through
DHS
and the Family Court were quick to do their work and put a stop to the child’s
long term therapy, and remove the father from having contact with his child
falsely alleging he was emotionally abusing his boy.
In
1997 the Court ordered that the fathers contact continue to be suspended
pending the finalization of all other jurisdiction. That was argued by the
father in court a year before when contact had been suspended but the senior
judge refused.
In the Family
Court there are only discretionary decisions
made in this jurisdiction,
the rule of law does not apply.
Now
that one suspect paedophile Mr. Lyndon
James Walker psychologist,, <see http://members.ocean.com.au/walkerl/index.htm for profile> is employed by the Family Court’s
mediation centre in Moorabbin as counsellor/psychologist it should give every parent comfort
to know that in this diabolical networked system they should expect little
or nothing at all.
In
1994 Renata Alexander was a key connection in the
Network. She had vast experience in Legal Aid so whatever needed to be done to
further her man hating distorted feminist agenda she was a good pick. It is
believed that she conspired with DHS to fabricate evidence against the father
who was a witness in another case in the Family Court. Ms. Alexander can be
seen working around the traps and now, considering the networked, government
agenda and control program, she has been also awarded with a knighthood (or
should that read knithood?) by a coming up of ranks
as a part time member in VCAT. Well done.
In
1996 when the Family Court kept adjourning the hearing to determine whether the
father could get legal representation thru legal aid, VLA held up the fathers
application pending new guidelines that would preclude him. When the father
asked for a review of the decision he was told that his file had been shredded.
In
VCAT hearing even part time member
VLA
have been also targeting the fathers solicitor for
years and have had Access Law’s legal funding revoked. This is after VLA
falsely charged Gabriel Kuek with mishandling of
cases (while, of course, engaging Mr. Perkins as counsel).
Even a senior
lawyer who advised Kuek to withdraw off a case in
1996
committed perjury
before VLA Tribunal when he then stated otherwise.
Incidently,
the VLA Committee consists of judges, lawyers and lay people – a good place to
have the Network placed to enact their intended evil.
Victorian Psychologists
Board
The
father has also lodged a number of complaints against psychologists who he
believes have acted fraudulently in this case. Unfortunately he has not
received fair treatment and his concerns were never investigated except for one
time when the Board agreed that fraud had been committed. This was because
former chief judge of the Family Court Alestair Nicholson
intervened into one investigation involving a court appointed psychologist in
order to stop an investigation from proceeding. The psychologist discovered in
the course of being cross-examined in VCAT that her sessions with the father
had been taped so the father was able to prove his allegations, so the Network
had to devise a way for her and themselves to be protected. Or could it be
because the present chairman of the Victorian Psyche Board is the former
supervisor of one of the suspect professional satanist/paedophiles?
It certainly
would be convenient to have a Satanist/paedophile
minder on top of the
heap as it would ensure all sensitive
matters can be
handled discreetly.
Munchausen by Proxy - MBP
When
this diagnosis was coined the psychiatrist recognized what seemed a rare
disorder in mothers but it has since been used as a diabolical and destructive
poison upon many unsuspecting innocent mother because of misdiagnosis.
Fortunately the expert in Australia of the disorder is none other than
Professor Adler (DHS expert witness who backed father in VCAT) who appeared
clearly to the father to have now been coerced to continue the fraud and
cover-up by diagnosing the father to have MBP even though the Professor in 1998
had evidence from government files confirming the paedophile cover-up and what
the father stated was true.
Other Agencies involved
Karen Hogan from the Children Hospital Gatehouse Centre for
child abuse tried to stop the release of the hospital file to court. The
hospital also stated that the photographs taken of the child’s bruising when he
was two and a half have also disappeared. Did Hogan have anything to do with
this? Professor Adler is on the Hospital Board and was chief child psychiatrist
for years. You would expect these professionals to do the right thing but maybe
something else is happening – The Network
A great way to get
children early is to infiltrate child care centres so that a steady flow of
victims are available. The child attended Norfolk
Street Child Care Centre and was sexually abused there also. But the child
care centre was run by DHS so everything could remain hidden – The Network
VCAT, the Victorian Bar, and
the Legal Practices Tribunal – The Sting
One
of the most effective ways to disempower a whistleblower is to annihilate his
legal team and supporters through threat and intimidation. This has been
continual since the seriousness of potential exposure loomed in 1995 and 1996
due to the startling evidence at the time. One solicitor chose to quit the
profession and the fathers current legal team has been
at the end of the hammer of the Network ever since they took on the task in
1996. That is Gabriel Kuek of Access Law and David
Perkins senior counsel who has represented the father over the many years that
this matter has remained unresolved.
Since
taking on the case both have been the target of various state government run
agencies who have the ability to use intimidation and
manipulation of the law to get their required result and that is to destroy
them so that the father has no ability legally to defend himself. David Perkins
is presently facing disciplinary proceeding where it is reported the Legal Practices Tribunal may disbar him.
The whole matter rests on these trumped up contempt charges for telling the
Tribunal member that because of what he did in perverting justice was
inexcusable.
The
VCAT Act says that you cannot insult a member as it could place you in contempt
of court. Tribunal member Davis could not bear the truth of Mr. Perkins
statements in October 2000 and probably together with former bully Kellam J (who was VCAT president at the time) issued
proceedings against Perkins to charge him with contempt. The contempt proceedings
in VCAT December 2000 were a farce in that nothing was inquired of the
Tribunals behaviour to have warranted such a submission made before a judicial
officer. Insults aside; it was true! But it gave the network a golden
opportunity to wield their evil intent against Perkins to try to finally
eradicate him as he cost the government millions of dollars in penalty court
payments for discovering their corrupt and bullying ways, and now representing
a father who has the potential of exposing the networks corruption in a
satanic/paedophile cover-up, he needed to be attended to finally. Perkins was
never into ‘clubbing’ with the legal fraternity so on the outer of other
lawyers and their mate judges so in 2003 the Victorian Bar decided to do their part in ridding their ranks of
this danger by also charging Perkins with misconduct under their code and
further the process by placing it before the LPT to hammer the final nail in the coffin.
The LPT has
already decided on Perkins guilt on all counts and handed down it’s penalty
on Wednesday 1st
December 2004.
Given
that the Tribunals reasons read like a childish mixed up assessment clumsily
trying to justify an agenda to inflict their underlying evil purpose it is no
surprise that in the middle of the hearing at LPT when a Tribunal member forgot
to disable his mobile from ringing, embarrassingly it rings with the tune, “The
Sting”, Oh how poetic! I’m sure Tribunal lay member Farcas
can recall his embarrassment.
Gabriel
Kuek of Access Law is awaiting the hammer in a
decision yet to be handed down in the Supreme Court of Appeal. Typically
government VLA submitted to that court that they intended to pursue Kuek relentlessly and at all costs.
The
network is now well established. The courts give lenient if any sentence to sex
offenders including pedophiles. The 10,000 strong demonstration
in June 2004 on the steps of Victorian parliament house regarding these serious
anomalies in the system in regard to sentencing is testament to the level of
dissatisfaction we have in just in our State alone.
The
father has not had any real contact with his son for over 8 years; he has been
under medical supervision to enable him to at least cope with the situation but
has not given up his fight for his son. His child is over 13 now and still with
his mother attending a Steiner school where many of her long term friends
school their children. Interestingly Rudolf Steiner was associated with key
people within the satanic movement.
Only a Public National Royal Commission into this corruption
can save our children from further evil
Government,
DHS and the Family Court system
prime children for
paedophilia.
Links
Child Sexual Abuse Program (CSAPP)
( http://www.csapp.org.au/ )
Persons Against Ritual Abuse -
Torture
Munchausen Syndrome
< Home of Fathers 4 Justice - Victoria,
Australia >
|
116 |
These two above clippings are merely representative of the extent of press coverage given the earlier phase of Dr. Michaelson's case.