DEFENDING MASONIC RITUAL CHILD-TORTURE CULT FROM "RELIGION SLUR" IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Article by gaiaguys' Vivienne Legg
January 2007
(above: logo from OTO "right to kill" webpage)
LAWYERS WEEKLY REPORTS
DEFENDING MASONIC RITUAL CHILD-TORTURE CULT FROM "RELIGION SLUR" IS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Article by gaiaguys' Vivienne Legg
January 2007
(above: logo from OTO "right to kill" webpage)
Independent sources inform us that, after finding herself hauled before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal on religious vilification charges (because of her attempts to have a child pornography/pedophile ritual-abuse ring finally investigated by the corrupt Victorian police force), child psychologist Dr Michaelson turned to the Public Interest Law Clearing House (PILCH) for help. PILCH, "Seeking to meet the legal needs of community groups, not for profit organisations and individuals from disadvantaged or marginalised backgrounds", turned her away. Why? Because they had already agreed to represent the Ordo Templi Orientis, the secret society she said "appeared to be" the perpetrators of the crimes she described.
Lawyers Weekly, "Australia's leading information resource [and "Bible"] for the legal professional", reported in its December 6th, 2006 article, Pro bono effort muzzles religion slur, how this "runaway slur " was "reined in" by Phillips Fox in Melbourne. [article below]
Apparently it's not enough to repeat the finding that no "proof" could be produced by Dr Michaelson for her claims against the OTO when the fact is that the police covered and refused to investigate those claims. Now Lawyer's Weekly's Alex Boxsell has taken the liberty of asserting that the account is therefore false! As I wrote last month, “NO PROOF HAS BEEN PRODUCED” DOES NOT MEAN “IT IS NOT TRUE”. Last month the Melbourne media ambiguously reported that no proof has ever been produced to support the allegations (presumably those linking the society to an alleged paedophile network of politicians, police and TV figures). Then, in the OTO's Terms of Settlement, point G reads, "Dr Michaelson has not produced any proof that any OTO members are or have been involved in such practices". Then Boxsell goes way out on a limb and asserts that none of the (lengthy and detailed) document is based on fact. "Phillips Fox ultimately succeeded in showing the document had no factual basis." NO! They only succeeded in determining that no proof has been produced in relation to the OTO! Even the corrupt Ombudsman's office shows significant parts of the account to be true in its own report as outlined by the Victorian media in 2004!
Boxsell leads his readers to believe that the concerned document had originally been posted on Michaelson's CSAPP web site and then spread across the world. In contrast to this, even the OTO press release explains that David Icke's website launched the document into cyberspace. Innumerable followers of this evil saga of course know that it originated on David Icke's website, in early 2003, and we picked it up from there and only at a later date did it accidentally, and briefly, appear on the CSAPP website. Now that those highly trained legal professionals at Lawyers Weekly have decided that "no proof was provided" means "it is not true, nor is anything else she said" they can continue with the additional unjustified slur that those who have worked to expose this horrendous conspiracy are, of course, conspiracy "theorists" looking for "fodder".
David Leggatt, who oversaw the case for OTO, described the acts of which he said the OTO was accused in an email campaign, as "just vile". How exactly does he rate the acts which the OTO's own documents describe? Why is there NEVER any comment about these key parts of the OTO philosophy although, as explained in OTO official David Botrill's formal complaint to the Equal Opportunity Commission of Victoria, OTO members "practically engage with the mysteries" spelled out in The Book of the Law.
III,43: Let the Scarlet Woman beware! If pity and compassion and tenderness visit her heart; if she leave my work to toy with old sweetnesses; then shall my vengeance be known. I will slay me her child: I will alienate her heart: I will cast her out from men: as a shrinking and despised harlot shall she crawl through dusk wet streets, and die cold and an-hungered. [From the OTO's Book of the Law of Thelema which members swear to defend and which they promote, as Catheryn Prowse would know from reading the publicly available documents that we can all now read.]
Liber 156 .9. Thou hast health; slay thyself in the fervour of thine abandonment unto Our Lady. Let thy flesh hang loose upon thy bones, ... Let thy foot trample the belly of thy wife, and let the babe at her breast be the prey of dogs and vultures. 11. For if thou dost not this with thy will, then shall We do this despite thy will. So that thou attain to the Sacrament of the Graal in the Chapel of Abominations".
Is this vile, Mr. Leggatt?
Nonetheless, while completely omitting any suggestion that the OTO may have been to blame for their own lowering in the eyes of the community, Lawyers Weekly champions this effort as the reigning in of a "religion slur".
Reportedly, "only the second time that the controversial Religious and Racial Tolerance Act 2001 (Vic) has been tested" this case awaits the warranted greater comment from the mainstream media, whose recent articles, like Lawyers Weekly, also completely avoided any mention of the OTO's legal action against the authors of this website, through the VCAT.
Did anybody question the likelihood that the Freemasonry-riddled legal profession may have offered up some of the OTO's lesser brethren to save them from their troubles?
“I will assist a Companion Royal Arch Mason when I see him engaged in any difficulty, and will espouse his cause so far as to extricate him from the same, whether he be right or wrong.” - (Malcom C. Duncan, Duncan's Masonic Ritual and Monitor, p. 230)
Our respectful formal demands, of the many participants in Victoria and from the Australian Capital Territory judiciary and the legal fraternity who are/were involved in the ongoing series of defamation actions against us there, all fell on deaf ears. The first hearing in the ACT was successful against us to the tune of +$30,000. Bankruptcy proceedings from that June 2005 judgment are reportedly underway. However, the next action against us in November 2006, for an additional +$50,000 was (inexplicably?) "stood over generally". And at the time of this writing, we await further correspondence from the solicitors of the ACT Magistrate who originally found against us who, on November 2006 is now threatening another lawsuit for this website exposé. Stay bookmarked.
We, the grass roots, in a rising storm tide of moral outrage, can no longer be silenced.
Pandora's box gapes open and the word "occult" (literally: "hidden") has lost its shine in this Silent Revolution of Truth.
LAWYERS WEEKLY
Pro bono effort muzzles religion slur
By Alex Boxsell
http://www.lawyersweekly.com.au/articles/32/0C047B32.asp?Type=53&Category=853
A RUNAWAY slur about religion Ordo Templi Orientis (OTO), unwittingly let loose on the internet by
the Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program Inc (CSAPP), was reined in by DLA Phillips Fox in
Melbourne.
Overseen by national pro bono partner, David Leggatt, but run by solicitor Cathryn Prowse, the case
was only the second time that the controversial Religious and Racial Tolerance Act 2001 (Vic) has
been tested.
With about 3000 members in the US and only 60 in Australia, Prowse said the initial hurdle lay in
trying to prove that OTO was a recognised religion, in order for the Act to apply. In view of this, she
spent a considerable time with members of OTO, compiling very detailed witness statements.
“It had been on foot for about a year and half [and] it was relatively active the entire time,” Prowse
said.
“To get to a hearing with the OTO members and having to detail all of their practices and beliefs …
was quite a large effort.”
The law suit arose after CSAPP had published on its website a document that alleged OTO was
engaged in satanic or religious ritualistic sexual abuse of children. The document quickly spread
across the world, even becoming fodder for conspiracy theorists who alleged the OTO’s practices
had infiltrated the highest echelons of government.
After discovering the document, OTO issued a complaint of racial vilification under the Act, and was
referred to Phillips Fox by the Public Interest Law Clearing House (PILCH), Victoria.
“What was really interesting about this case was that there were these private people who found
themselves the subject of an email campaign – that they were engaging, because of their beliefs, in
paedophilia, child sacrifice and satanic acts – which were just vile,” Leggatt said.
“[Prowse] did an exceptional job, in what is very demanding work,” he said. “It was very emotional.
They were very serious allegations, and as we were going into new territory there was just a lot of
heat in the matter.”
Leggatt said pro bono cases, such as this one, are actively encouraged by the firm, with lawyers
urged to dedicate five per cent of their professional time to the cause.
Manager of the public interest scheme, Tabitha Lovett, said PILCH’s membership is made up of 28
law firms, 7 corporate in-house legal departments, 3 professional organisations, 5 universities and
27 community legal centres. Individual cases are assessed on merit by PILCH, and the likelihood of
either testing legislation, or serving the public interest.
“We try and spread the work out across all the firms,” Lovett said. “It’s really a case of trying to
match [the work] with firms that have got expertise in the area, [assuming] they’ve actually got the
resources to run the matter.”
Phillips Fox ultimately succeeded in showing the document had no factual basis, with CSAPP and the
original author being forced to formerly withdraw their allegations. Lovett said both PILCH and the
client were very pleased with the settlement, arrived at in the Victorian Civil and Administrative
Tribunal, human rights division last week.
6 December 2006
