To the Real
Scientists
Michael
Horn
Professionals in any
discipline must, of necessity, evaluate information produced, submitted and/or published
in their field of study based solely on its merits. Any personal animosities,
or prejudices either for or against the source of the information, must be set
aside so that only clear thinking in determining the factual accuracy is the
basis of consideration.
If this standard is
applied to the scientific information published by Swiss UFO contactee Billy Meier - and it rarely
has been by those in the scientific field - a unique situation presents itself,
which will indeed challenge the thinking of many scientists. It will
also shed light on any unconsciously held beliefs about "such things as
UFOS and extraterrestrials" - and their own actual
level of knowledge and expertise.
In addition to having an
abundance of the best, clearest and still irreproducible physical UFO evidence,
Meier has published a voluminous amount of very specific, highly detailed scientific information in
numerous fields of study, most of it still only available in German. Thankfully, due to recent efforts by interested parties,
more is being translated into English all the time. The ongoing corroboration of Meier's information automatically occurs with
each so-called "new, official discovery" of something Meier had
already, verifiably, published. It's even more compelling because the "discoverers" and the reporting sources
are consistently unaware that the information was first provided to a
"Swiss farmer" by "extraterrestrials", often decades ago.
For the skeptics, who are suddenly compelled to launch serious online
searches in efforts to show that Meier is really just plagiarizing already
existing scientific information, several problems occur. First, a good deal of
Meier's information was published in copyrighted books and documents
beginning in 1975, while earlier documents from the 1950s and 1960s are harder
to prove (even though there is an interesting mechanism that may ultimately
confirm their authenticity, as well as accuracy, too).
When it is said, for instance, that Meier scooped scientists by 23 years
regarding information about the moon's surface, some skeptics will search the internet (certainly
not available to Meier or anyone else during the 1950s through 1980s, and even
later) and perhaps point to scientists who offered theories that were similar in varying degrees. But even
then, such information wasn't easily available, and with no effective
search technology at the time much, if not most, of it only saw the light of
day in specialized, often obscure academic papers and/or publications,
etc.
To this we add that there
is absolutely no evidence that Meier had access to even the theoretical or
academic information. The investigations established that he didn't receive or purchase scientific periodicals and didn't have access to universities, libraries, or even television, etc. Nor was there evidence of interest in, or reasons for
writing about, the various (often abstract) scientific matters, especially for
a poor, one-armed, "Swiss farmer" (on a disability pension) who was verifiably
concerned mainly with eking out an existence, in a remote and rugged area of
rural Switzerland, while renovating a rundown farmhouse for his
family. And also, of course, while he was quietly presenting the world with the most
stunningly clear UFO evidence, which he actually began doing in 1964 in India*.
(Click on the image in this
article to enlarge it, which reveals that the reporter saw some 80 of Meier’s early UFO photos and refers to Meier’s
claiming to have had some 400 additional ones, which were stolen. Phobol Cheng, a retired UN diplomat, was also an eyewitness to the events in India, along with 100s of other people.)
However, when it's the
scientists of today who are proclaiming that something is a "new
discovery" it means that they have confirmed that information and are
themselves not referring
to any previous "theories" as the basis for their announcements. And
so it must also be noted that Meier's information always has the
(ultimately correct) information presented as fact, not theory, and usually
presented in the context of a casual,
informative conversation, or in respose to a specific question that Meier himself posed to the extraterrestrials.
So a good detective might
say that both the means and opportunity were missing, as can also be said of
the motive, when one considers that Meier has never chosen to seek any fame or
fortune. Nor has he even been a driving force
in having his information translated into English - where most of the world's
"mainstream" scientific information is broadly published. In fact, all the proceeds from his books, etc.,
go directly into FIGU, the non-profit organization that basically exists to
disseminate his information, do charity work, etc.
While the skeptics seek to discredit Meier, none of them have produced, or will ever produce any evidence that they accurately foretold any of these "new discoveries" - brilliant as they fancy
themselves to be. So, in addition to barking like mad dogs at
Meier's heels, they have to concoct baseless theories and conspiratorial fantasies that
effectively attribute to Meier fantastic psychic abilities, along
with flawlessly deft accomplishments and sheer mastery in dozens
of technological fields.
And skeptics and scientists alike will have to ask themselves, "Did Meier, the one-armed man who presented hundreds of clear, irreroducible, daytime UFO photos, films, video, sound recordings and metal samples, with no educational background in the sciences, no collaborators or resources, also find a magical way to come up with volumes of impeccably accurate scientific information, years and decades before 'official discovery', and leave it lying around in German texts for equally long, never publicly trumpeting it himself, until interested parties would find, translate and publish it in other languages - and do it all just to try to fool...me?"
There is so much specific, "prophetically" accurate
information published by Meier, on so many topics, that the skeptics simply
don't have enough fingers to plug the dyke against the inevitable flood of
undeniable evidence of Meier's authenticity and must inevitably come to the only logical conclusion: Meier is telling the
truth.
Regarding the mechanism I mentioned earlier that will serve to authenticate Meier's information from decades ago, where no original documents may still exist, if I am correct this only requires that we periodically revisit this information and see if more of the - specific - events are occurring as foretold. (Speaking of which, just how likely is it that Meier would have long ago published information that is relevant to the very rarified discussion, under way since 1994, about pre Big Bang events? Wouldn't real scientists want to know? Even I, as a layman, sure would.)
Hopefully it won't require
the fulfillment of even more negative events, or the coming exhaustion
of all excuses and convoluted, failed conspiratorial theories by the skeptics,
for the real scientists to swallow their pride, put aside their egos and study the treasure of
scientific information provided by a very advanced extraterrestrial race, and
made available to us with the help of one rather courageous man named Billy
Meier.
*Photos below taken by Billy
Meier in India, 1964.
(Enlarged below)
.jpg)
Eight UFOs near the Ashoka Ashram with Phobol's ayah (nursemaid in the foreground looking at the ships)
Posted by:
Michael
Horn
November 27, 2010